JurisDraft

Litigation & Court Documents

Dismissed With Prejudice vs. Without Prejudice: What the Difference Actually Means

Two words in a dismissal order determine whether a case is truly over or can be refiled — and getting this wrong has real consequences.

4 min read

When a case is dismissed, whether it's "with prejudice" or "without prejudice" determines everything about what happens next — and the difference is easy to misunderstand if you're not familiar with the terminology.

Without prejudice means it can be refiled

A dismissal without prejudice closes the current case but leaves the door open to refile the same claim later — often used when a case is dismissed on a technical or procedural ground rather than its merits, such as a defective complaint that can be corrected and refiled.

With prejudice means it's over, permanently

A dismissal with prejudice is a final judgment on the merits — the claim cannot be refiled, even in a different court. This typically happens when a case is dismissed after a full opportunity to prove it, or as a sanction, or as part of a settlement.

Why the wording in a motion or stipulation matters

Whether a dismissal is with or without prejudice is often something the parties negotiate or a motion specifically requests — getting this wording wrong in a stipulation or motion can permanently give up rights that were never intended to be waived.

This is a detail worth getting drafted correctly

Whether you're responding to a motion to dismiss or negotiating a settlement that includes dismissal terms, precise language around prejudice is one of those details that's easy to overlook and expensive to get wrong.

Need this handled?

Civil Litigation

Complaints, answers, and motions for civil litigation matters.